“The DEA would come in and destroy you”: a qualitative study of fear and unintended consequences among opioid prescribers in WV

Original research
by
Sedney, Cara L. et al

Release Date

2022

Geography

USA

Language of Resource

English

Full Text Available

Yes

Open Access / OK to Reproduce

Yes

Peer Reviewed

Yes

Objective

This study aims to better understand the impact of legislation aimed to restrict opioid prescribing on patients and providers.

Findings/Key points

Four themes emerged, 1. Fear of disciplinary action, 2. Exacerbation of opioid prescribing fear due to restrictive legislation, 3. Care shifts and treatment gaps, and 4. Conversion to illicit substances. The clinicians recognized the harms of inappropriate prescribing and how this could affect their patients. Decreases in opioid prescribing were already occurring prior to the law implementation. Disciplinary actions against opioid prescribers resulted in prescriber fear, which was then exacerbated by SB 273 and contributed to shifts in care that led to forced tapering and opioid under-prescribing. Providers felt that taking on patients who legitimately required opioids could jeopardize their career.

Design/methods

20 semi-structured interviews

Keywords

Policy/Regulatory
Hesitancy of prescribers
About prescribers