“The DEA would come in and destroy you”: a qualitative study of fear and unintended consequences among opioid prescribers in WV

Original research
par
Sedney, Cara L. et al

Date de publication

2022

Géographie

USA

Langue de la ressource

English

Texte disponible en version intégrale

Oui

Open Access / OK to Reproduce

Oui

Évalué par des pairs

Yes

L’objectif

This study aims to better understand the impact of legislation aimed to restrict opioid prescribing on patients and providers.

Constatations/points à retenir

Four themes emerged, 1. Fear of disciplinary action, 2. Exacerbation of opioid prescribing fear due to restrictive legislation, 3. Care shifts and treatment gaps, and 4. Conversion to illicit substances. The clinicians recognized the harms of inappropriate prescribing and how this could affect their patients. Decreases in opioid prescribing were already occurring prior to the law implementation. Disciplinary actions against opioid prescribers resulted in prescriber fear, which was then exacerbated by SB 273 and contributed to shifts in care that led to forced tapering and opioid under-prescribing. Providers felt that taking on patients who legitimately required opioids could jeopardize their career.

La conception ou méthodologie de recherche

20 semi-structured interviews

Mots clés

Policy/Regulatory
Hesitancy of prescribers
About prescribers