Common liability to addiction and “gateway hypothesis”: Theoretical, empirical and evolutionary perspective

Lit review
by
Vanyukov, Michael M. et al

Release Date

2012

Geography

USA

Language of Resource

English

Full Text Available

Yes

Open Access / OK to Reproduce

Yes

Peer Reviewed

Yes

Objective

Two competing concepts address the development of involvement with psychoactive substances: the “gateway hypothesis” (GH) and common liability to addiction (CLA).

Findings/Key points

Whereas the “gateway” hypothesis does not specify mechanistic connections between “stages”, and does not extend to the risks for addictions, the concept of common liability to addictions incorporates sequencing of drug use initiation as well as extends to related addictions and their severity, provides a parsimonious explanation of substance use and addiction co-occurrence, and establishes a theoretical and empirical foundation to research in etiology, quantitative risk and severity measurement, as well as targeted non-drug-specific prevention and early intervention.

Design/methods

Lit review

Keywords

Policy/Regulatory
Hesitancy of prescribers
Advocacy
Illegal drugs