Common liability to addiction and “gateway hypothesis”: Theoretical, empirical and evolutionary perspective

Lit review
par
Vanyukov, Michael M. et al

Date de publication

2012

Géographie

USA

Langue de la ressource

English

Texte disponible en version intégrale

Oui

Open Access / OK to Reproduce

Oui

Évalué par des pairs

Yes

L’objectif

Two competing concepts address the development of involvement with psychoactive substances: the “gateway hypothesis” (GH) and common liability to addiction (CLA).

Constatations/points à retenir

Whereas the “gateway” hypothesis does not specify mechanistic connections between “stages”, and does not extend to the risks for addictions, the concept of common liability to addictions incorporates sequencing of drug use initiation as well as extends to related addictions and their severity, provides a parsimonious explanation of substance use and addiction co-occurrence, and establishes a theoretical and empirical foundation to research in etiology, quantitative risk and severity measurement, as well as targeted non-drug-specific prevention and early intervention.

La conception ou méthodologie de recherche

Lit review

Mots clés

Policy/Regulatory
Hesitancy of prescribers
Advocacy
Illegal drugs