Release Date
Geography
Language of Resource
Full Text Available
Open Access / OK to Reproduce
Peer Reviewed
Objective
We conducted a process evaluation of a novel harm reduction-oriented addiction medicine consultation team [AMCT]. Our specific aims included examining patients’ perspectives on factors that facilitated or hindered AMCT delivery, and its impact on their hospital care and outcomes.
Findings/Key points
Participants highlighted the AMCT’s harm reduction approach; reputation amongst peers; and specialized training as especially important intervention facilitators. Key barriers that constrained the impact of the team included unmet expectations; difficulty accessing follow-up care; and residual conflicts between the AMCT’s harm reduction approach and the abstinence-only orientation of some hospital staff. For a few participants these conflicts led to negative experiences. Despite this, participants reported that the AMCT had positive impacts overall, including declines in substance use, enhanced mental and emotional wellbeing, and improved socio-economic circumstances.
Design/methods
Semi-structured interviews (n=21)