Release Date
Geography
Language of Resource
Full Text Available
Open Access / OK to Reproduce
Peer Reviewed
Objective
Our objective was to describe early implementation of Risk Mitigation Guidance (RMG) among prescribers in BC.
Findings/Key points
Analysis of administrative databases demonstrated limited uptake of the intervention outside large urban centres and a highly specific profile of urban prescribers, with larger and more complex caseloads associated with RMG prescribing. Nurse practitioners were three times more likely to prescribe than general practitioners. Qualitatively, the study identified five themes related to the five CFIR domains: 1) RMG is helpful but controversial; 2) Motivations and challenges to prescribing; 3) New options and opportunities for care but not enough to ‘win the arms race’; 4) Lack of implementation support and resources; 5) Limited infrastructure.
Design/methods
We conducted a convergent mixed methods study drawing population-level linked administrative health data and qualitative interviews with 17 prescribers.