Release Date
Geography
Language of Resource
Full Text Available
Open Access / OK to Reproduce
Peer Reviewed
Objective
Examining the effectiveness of involuntary treatment for individuals with substance use disorders (SUDs).
Findings/Key points
Most studies were from the United States, Canada, and China: most measured substance use changes, criminal recidivism, and retention in treatment. Only 7 studies comparing involuntary to voluntary intervention reported improved outcomes in the involuntary group, with most for retention in treatment and only one showing a reduction in substance use. Six out of 7 studies comparing different involuntary interventions occurred in the context of prison or probation. No studies compared the involuntary treatment to no treatment. Only 11 described evidence-based treatment for SUDs, while 5 diagnosed and co-treated psychiatric comorbidity and 11 discussed the motivation for treatment.
Design/methods
Lit review (42 studies included)