Commentary
par
Schaaf, Marta et al
Date de publication
2022
Géographie
International
Langue de la ressource
English
Texte disponible en version intégrale
Oui
Open Access / OK to Reproduce
Oui
Évalué par des pairs
Yes
L’objectif
In this Commentary, we discuss the potential advantages and disadvantages of social accountability strategies in promoting the availability of a full range of sexual and reproductive health services for excluded and historically oppressed populations.
Constatations/points à retenir
Programs employed several strategies, including linking their strategies to legal accountability, budgetary expenditures, or other institutionalized processes; taking steps to ensure inclusion, including through consultation with excluded or stigmatized groups throughout the program design and implementation process; specific outreach and support to integrating marginalized groups into program activities; and the creation of separate spaces to ensure confidentiality and safety.
Mots clés
Stigma
Peer/PWLLE program involvement
