Lit review
par
Ho, Chuong & Charlene Argáez
Date de publication
2018
Géographie
Canada
Langue de la ressource
English
Texte disponible en version intégrale
Oui
Open Access / OK to Reproduce
Oui
Évalué par des pairs
No
L’objectif
This Rapid Response report aims to review the effectiveness of the use of telehealth-delivered OAT compared to standard OAT. Cost-effectiveness and evidence-based guidelines regarding the use of telehealth-delivered OAT for the treatment of opioid use disorders will also be examined.
Constatations/points à retenir
Not much research available yet: Limited evidence from one non-randomized retrospective study showed that after one year of treatment, those who participated in telehealth-delivered OAT were more likely to remain on uninterrupted OAT than those who received in-person OAT. The British Columbia Centre of Substance Abuse recommends that home-based, self-initiated OAT may be considered for those who have previous experience with OAT, or who have significant barriers to office attendance, while those who express significant apprehension of experiencing withdrawal, or those with concurrent alcohol and sedative use or misuse, are not likely to be good candidates for home induction. No relevant clinical studies regarding the use of home-based self-initiated therapy and no relevant cost-effectiveness studies regarding the use of telehealth or home-based self-initiated OAT were identified.
La conception ou méthodologie de recherche
Lit search
Mots clés
Clinical guidance
Evidence base
Policy/Regulatory
Safer supply
About prescribers